Bibliographie

Abram, D. (2010). Becoming animal: an earthly cosmology. New York, NY: Pantheon Books Publisher.

Benyus, J. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.

Bordo, S. (2001). Selections from the flight to objectivity. In I. Bartsch & M. Lederman (Eds.) The gender and science reader (pp. 82-97). New York, NY: Routledge. p. 93.

Bovaira, F. (Producer), & Amenabar, A. (Director). (2009). Agora. Spain: Telecino Cinema.

Classen, C. (Ed.). (2005). The book of touch (Sensory Formations). Oxford: Berg Publishers.

Clement, J. (1982). Student's preconceptions in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66-71.

Clement, J. (1994). Imagistic simulation and physical intuition in expert problem solving. Proceedings of the sixteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbraum.

Cromer, A. (1995). Uncommon sense: The heretical nature of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Crouch, C., Fagen, A., Callan, J. & Mazur, E. (2004). Classroom demonstrations: Learning tools or entertainment? American Journal of Physics, 72 (6), 835-838

Diderot, D. (1746/1961). De l'interprétation de la nature [On the interpretation of nature]. Oeuvres philosophiques. Paris: Garnier. (Original work published in 1746).

Falk, D. (2009). Galileo's "falling bodies" experiment re-created at Pisa. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Kv-U5tjNCY in February 2012.

Galileo, G. Dialogue sur les deux grands systèmes du monde, Paris : Le Seuil, 1992, pp. 316-317.

Gleick, J. (1992). Genius: the life and science of Richard Feynman. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

Grabinger, R.S. & Dunlap, J.C. (1995). Rich environments for active learning: a definition. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 3(2), 5-34.

Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008, May 30). Culture, gender, and math. Science, 320 , 1164–65.

Hadamard, J. (1945). An essay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field. New York, NY: Dover Publications.

Hall, H.S. (1956). Scientists and politicians. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 12 (2), 269-287.

Harding, S. (1996). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: what is 'strong objectivity'? In E.F. Keller & H.E. Longino (Eds.), Feminism and science (pp. 244-245). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harding, S. (2001). Is science multicultural? Challenges, resources, opportunities, uncertainties. In I. Bartsch & M. Lederman (Eds.), The gender and science reader (pp. 189-212). New York, NY: Routledge.

Hazari, Z., Sadler, P. & Tai, R. (2008). Gender differences in the high school and affective experiences of introductory college physics students. The Physics Teacher, 46, 423-427.

Heisenberg, W. (1990), “Theory, Criticism and a Philosophy”, in Salam, A. (ed.), Unification of Fundamental Forces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85–124.

Hewlett, S. A., Buck Luce, C., Servon, L. J., Sherbin, L., Shiller, P., Sosnovich, E., & Sumberg, K. (2008). The Athena Factor: Reversing the brain drain in science, engineering and technology (Harvard Business Review Research Report). Boston: Harvard Business Publishing.

Hewitt, P. G. (2002). Conceptual physics (9^th ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley.

Hill, C., Corbett C. And St. Rose, A., Why So Few Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics?, AAUW, 2010.

Howes, D. (2005). Empire of the senses: The sensual culture reader. New York: Berg.

Kaiser, M.K., Proffitt, D.R. (1984). The development of sensitivity to causually-relevant dynamic information. Child Development, 55, 1614-1624.

Kozhevnikov, M. & Hegarty, M. (2001). Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, (3), 439-453.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenges to Western thoughts. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Leiss, W. (2008). The Priesthood of Science, retrieved from http://leiss.ca/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/scientists_and_priests.pdf in 2012.

Les femmes dans l'histoire du C.N.R.S., (2006). Retrieved from http://www2.cnrs.fr/presse/thema/374.htm in January 2012.

Marliere, S., Urma, D., Florens, J.L. & Marchi, F. (2004). Multi-sensorial interaction with a nano-scale phenomenon: the force curve. Proceedings of Euro Haptics 2004 (pp. 246-252). Munich, Germany.

Martin, E. (1996). In E.F. Keller & H.E. Longino (Eds.), Feminism and science, p. 105, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

May, T. & Semetsky, I. (2008). Deleuze, ethical education, and the unconscious. In I. Semetsky (Ed.) Nomadic education: Variations on a theme by Deleuze and Guattari (pp. 143-157). Rotterdam: Senses Publishers.

Mazur, E. (2008) The make-believe world of real-world physics. AAPT 2008 Summer Meeting, Millikan Award Lecture, University of Alberta, 22 July 2008.

Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, biology and the scientific revolution. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

Merchant, C. (2001). Dominion over nature. In I. Bartsch & M. Lederman (Eds.), The gender and science reader (pp. 67-81). New York, NY: Routledge.

Moss-Racusina, C., Dovidio, J., Brescollc, V., Grahama, M. & Handelsmana, J., Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students, P.N.A.S., August 2012

Mowus, I.R. (1992). Different experimental lives: Michael Faraday and William Sturgeon. History of Science, 30, 1-28.

R.L. Numbers, That creationism is a uniquely American phenomenon, in Galiléo goes to jail, R.L. Numbers ed., 2009, pp. 215 – 223.

Osler (2009) Galileo goes to jail, R. Number Ed., pp. 90 à 98

Oughourlian, (2013), Notre troisième cerveau, Paris, Ed. Albin Michel

Paterson, M. (2007). The senses of touch: Haptics, affects and technologies. Oxford: Berg.

Poincaré, H. (1902/1968). La science et l'hypothèse [Science and hypothesis]. Paris: Champs Sciences, Flammarion. p. 52.

Proffitt, D.R., Kaiser, M.K. & Whelan, S. (1990). Understanding wheel dynamics. Cognitive Psychology, 22 (3), 342–373.

Rasch, J., Tilmes, S., Turco, P., Robock, A., Oman, L., Chen, C., Stenchikov, L. & Garcia, R. (2008). An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols. Philosophical Transactions, Series A. Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences 366 (1882), 4007–4037.

Shank, M.H. (2009) Galileo goes to jail, R. Number Ed. p. 21

Shanon, B. (1976). Aristotelianism, Newtonianism and the physics of the layman. Perception, 5, 241-243.

Shiva, V. (2001). Democratizing biology: reinventing biology from a feminist, ecological, and third world perspective. In I. Bartsch & M. Lederman (Eds.) The gender and science reader (pp. 447-465). New York, NY: Routledge.

Smith, P. (2004). The body of the artisan: Art and experience in the scientific revolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Smolin, L. (2006). The trouble with physics: The rise of string theory, the fall of a science, and what comes next. New York, NY: First Mariner Books.

Snow, D. (2013), Sexual Dimorphism in European Upper Paleolithic Cave Art,  , American Antiquity 78(4), 2013, pp. 746–761, 2013.

Sprott, J.C. (2006). Physics demonstrations: a sourcebook for teachers of physics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. (Original work published in 1996).

Wertheim, M. (1997). Pythagoras' trousers: God, physics and the gender war. New York: Northon & Company.

Whitehead, A.N. (1933). Adventure of ideas. New York, NY: Collier Macmillan.

Wolpert, L. (1993). The unnatural nature of science: Why science does not make (common) sense. Harvard University Press.